The Institute for Objectivist Studies

Home » News » Work in progress (5)

Work in progress (5)


Some interesting work-in-progress out there to report:

Roderick Long has a very interesting paper up on his website, “Why Character Traits are Not Dispositions,” and I have some comments on it there (only tangentially related to the main claims of the paper, I have to admit). The paper is relevant to some of the discussion we’ve been having here on moral luck (and is also a good way of helping me buy time to produce my long-promised third installment on that topic). The link goes to a post on the Alabama Philosophical Society meeting in Pensacola in October. It’s a very impressive line-up, and I’m sure putting it together was as much work as writing a paper on character traits and dispositions.

The Atlas Society’s Roger Donway has just announced the “online publication” of a co-authored piece (with Robert Bradley) on Gabriel Kolko‘s A Reinterpretation of American History, 1900-1916, originally called The Triumph of Conservatism. The link takes you to a page of description on The Atlas Society’s website; there’s a link there to the PDF version of the published essay in The Independent Review. The Bradley-Donway essay was in fact published six months ago, but apparently the six-month embargo is up, hence my scare-quoted reference to it as a new “online publication.”

I suppose a third work in progress is IOS’s own Fall Seminar on concepts, to take place exactly a week from now at the Glen Ridge Community Center. Everything’s in place for that, and Carrie-Ann and I are really looking forward to it. I’ll try to post a few things here on concept-related material within the next few days. Meanwhile, here’s something to chew on.


P.S., 7:05 pm: I myself am at work on some annotations (posted on a different part of the IOS website) of Rand’s Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology. I have a long annotation on the first paragraph of the book, which I take pretty conclusively to imply an “open” as opposed to “closed” conception of Objectivism (if a “closed” conception can even be coherently stated in a way that contrasts clearly with an “open” conception, which I doubt, since I don’t think anyone has ever managed to do it). Anyway, I just finished with a commentary on sentence (1) of IOE [!], but the commentaries on sentences (2) and (3) should be shorter (should be), because their logic just follows from what I say about (1). I’m hoping to put more stuff on IOE (beyond the first paragraph) up on that page in advance of next Saturday’s epistemology seminar.


Comments closed

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: